However, for various reasons (futureproofing, fidelity, latency etc) I am thinking of changing it to 96k before it's too late.Ĭurious if anyone else has done this at a similar point in the process, and if so, what they might advise (including 'don't do it'!)ġ- project so far is instrumental, we haven't got to the vocals yet.Ģ- 70%ish of the project uses various VSTi's there's very little stuff actually recorded in WAV at this point - it's very much in virtual space.ģ- at some point there will be tracked live drums, guitars, vocals, plus when ready to commit, will be processing most of the VSTi's through outboard (where it helps).Ĥ - It is possible that prior to mix, we will dump the entire album to 2 inch, because 2 inch sounds great for this sort of material in my opinion.ġ- do I have to just change the project sample rate for each project, save as new, and ensure the existing small amount of 48k WAV stuff is converted? (I absolutely will save full copies of the existing projects and material as safeties of course)Ģ- are there VSTi's and VST plugin effects which will/may not function when running at 96 after running fine at 48? I have a broad bunch of plugs as well as some powered UAD2 etc.

Have been working on an album project in Nuendo which so far has been done at 48k 24 bit, which is what I normally work in.

Steinberg nuendo live 2